Skip to main content

Shareholder push for methane transparency gains ground

Published by
Hydrocarbon Engineering,


Three times in the last week shareholders at major energy companies have voted in double digits for more methane pollution disclosure: 10% at Berkshire Hathaway Energy; 24% at Dominion Energy; and 33%t at Occidental Petroleum. Given that two of the three resolutions from Arjuna Capital, in partnership with As You Sow (Dominion) and Baldwin Brothers (Berkshire & Occidental), were first-time proxy ballot measures, this is a very positive outcome. In another (and related) win, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) explicitly rejected a Dominion proposal to keep the methane measure off the proxy ballot.

While utilities such as Dominion are increasingly reliant on the reliable and efficient delivery of gas along the value chain, the 2015 failure of a gas injection well at Southern California Gas Company's Aliso Canyon Storage Field in Los Angeles exposed major vulnerabilities in the maintenance and safety of natural gas storage facilities. The incident revealed a lack of oversight and contingency planning in the face of a well blowout.

Natasha Lamb, managing partner at Arjuna Capital, said, "While our proposals at Berkshire, Dominion and Occidental did not obtain majority votes, we made enormous early progress with shareholders at all three companies on methane, and view this as a successful first step to apply more pressure for more data, greater disclosure and transparency on these issues."

Lamb continued, "For example, a sizable number of Dominion investors are understandably concerned the company is not managing its methane storage risks. The well blowout at Aliso canyon that released 100 000 t of methane in LA County exposed the vulnerability of natural gas storage wells drilled decades ago. Such releases are an absolute climate time bomb. Given that Dominion holds the third highest volume of natural gas in the US, managing these risks should be a first-order priority."

However, these messages have not yet been internalised by the company. At Dominion Energy's meeting on 10 May, the company defended its environmental record, and then proceeded to vote down multiple environmental and climate-motivated shareholder resolutions. The Arjuna Capital/As You Sow proposal covered such issues as well integrity, a key issue given the scope of damage from the disastrous blowout in California.

Research indicates methane leaks from gas operations could erase the climate benefits of reducing coal use. Methane emissions are a significant contributor to climate change, with an impact on global temperature roughly 84 times that of CO2 over a 20 year period. By one estimate, leaked methane represented US$30 billion dollars of lost revenue (3% of gas produced) in 2012. Yet, an October 2016 study published in Nature indicates methane emissions from the oil and gas sector are 20 to 60% higher than previously thought.

Arjuna said it would refile its shareholder proposals and that Dominion, in particular, must come to terms with the significant environmental threats posed by methane, especially since public safety, conservation efforts and climate considerations surrounding methane enjoy bipartisan support in Congress.

On 10 May 2017, the US Senate unexpectedly blocked a resolution that would have repealed an Interior Department rule from the Obama Administration that heavily restricts methane emissions from drilling operations on public lands. This rule sets the tone for utilities and treats methane as it should be, as a potent greenhouse gas that must be stopped from getting into the atmosphere.

Read the article online at: https://www.hydrocarbonengineering.com/the-environment/23052017/shareholder-push-for-methane-transparency-gains-ground/


 

Embed article link: (copy the HTML code below):


 

This article has been tagged under the following:

Downstream news North America downstream news