API: BLM methane rule could do harm
Published by Francesca Brindle,
Editorial Assistant
Hydrocarbon Engineering,
The American Petroleum Institute (API) expressed disappointment with a no vote to stop an unnecessary, costly and duplicative methane regulation, but said it was encouraged by the Interior Department's review of the rule as part of an executive order signed in March.
"America's natural gas and oil industry supports common sense regulation, but the BLM's technically flawed rule on methane emissions is an unnecessary and costly misstep," said API Upstream and Industry Operations Group Director Erik Milito. "The rule could impede US energy production while reducing local and federal government revenues.
"While it is disappointing that the Senate did not act to correct the rule more quickly, we look forward to working with the administration on policies that continue our commitment to safely produce the energy that Americans rely on, help consumers, create jobs, strengthen our national security, and protect our environment."
Data from the EPA's annual draft inventory of US greenhouse gas emissions report released in March fuelled questions as to why the existing BLM rule is necessary. The report shows that methane emissions from all petroleum systems decreased by over 28% since 1990, notably including a decrease of emissions from petroleum production of around 8% from 2014 levels. EPA attributed this improvement to decreases in emissions from associated gas venting and flaring.
"The US is a global leader in production and refining of natural gas and oil while cutting greenhouse gas emissions, the result of technological advances in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling. It is through innovation – not unnecessary, costly and duplicative regulation – that we are able to achieve this success."
BLM's redundant and technically flawed rule overlaps with existing state and EPA regulations and could further reduce activity on federal lands where natural gas production is already down 18% from 2010 to 2015. Analysis by Environmental Resources Management on the proposed rule found that the added cost of compliance could result in up to 40% of wells that flare on federal lands being permanently uneconomic to produce. Based on 2016 royalties reported by the federal Office of Natural Resources Revenue, even a 1% loss of royalties due to loss of production would result in lost government revenues of more than US$14 million.
Read the article online at: https://www.hydrocarbonengineering.com/the-environment/11052017/api-blm-methane-rule-could-do-harm/
You might also like
Repsol takes its multi-energy to major music festivals in Spain and Portugal
Repsol has joined forces with the six most important music promoters in Spain to jointly promote the use of different multi-energy solutions initially in 77 events.