API leads organisations in opposing Methane Emissions Reduction Act

The organisations, led by API, explain that the proposal is a “pay-for” that “could jeopardise affordable and reliable energy with likely little reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions" and that cost-effective regulation is a better approach.

“The undersigned organisations, on behalf of their diverse memberships and representing a substantial cross-section of the US economy as producers, distributors, and users of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, join together to oppose the Methane Emissions Reduction Act due to the adverse environmental and economic impacts it will likely cause and because methane emissions are already being mitigated via appropriate regulatory programs,” the groups wrote.

“To impose a misguided punitive tax on natural gas could significantly undermine any purported effort of this legislation to reduce GHG emissions,” the groups continued. “In addition to potentially detrimental environmental outcomes, the Methane Emissions Reduction Act could have adverse and disproportionate economic impacts nationwide. The potential direct cost of the bill to the economy, not including import fees, could initially be as high as US$14.4 billion, increasing 5% above inflation annually. As many as 155 000 jobs could be impacted by the tax, with the largest impacts concentrated in the health care and social assistance industries.”

In a statement, API said that thanks to innovation and industry actions, US methane emissions rates in the largest producing regions have declined 70% in the past decade, even as America produces more affordable, reliable and cleaner natural gas. API continues to work with the Biden administration to support the direct federal regulation of methane emissions for new and existing sources to build on this progress.

“If the objective is to reduce methane emissions, direct regulation of methane is the best method to implement such a government policy and do so in an equitable manner that is tied to actual emissions,” the groups wrote in the letter. “EPA is best-suited to address the challenges in reducing methane emissions because regulation stipulates the installation of cost-effective control technologies – as well as leak detection and repair requirements – that prevent and reduce methane emissions at oil and natural gas facilities.”

Read the article online at: https://www.hydrocarbonengineering.com/gas-processing/08092021/api-leads-organisations-in-opposing-methane-emissions-reduction-act/