Skip to main content

API study questions the benefits of new EPA ozone standards

Hydrocarbon Engineering,

EPA has exaggerated the benefits of its proposed new ozone standards, according to a new study conducted by NERA Economic Consulting for API. EPA’s calculation of the health benefits of the standards in its 2010 regulatory impact analysis are based on faulty assumptions, according to Howard Feldman, API Director of Regulatory and Scientific Affairs.

The study, entitled ‘Summary and Critique of the Benefits Estimates in the RIA for the Ozone NAAQS Reconsideration’, concluded by stating that ‘not one of EPA’s estimates of the benefits of reducing ozone to a tighter alternative ozone standard is as large as the costs of attaining that respective ozone standard.’

‘EPA’s claim that the ozone health benefits of the proposed standards are commensurate with the costs doesn’t meet the straight face test,’ said Feldman. ‘The ozone benefits are illusory, greatly inflated and would be dwarfed by the costs. The standards may not be achievable and, worse, could destroy millions of American jobs. They are certainly not a recipe for economic recovery.

‘When businesses can’t be started or can’t expand, jobs are lost,’ Feldman continued. ‘It’s hard to imagine something that would harm our economy more than these standards. And yet there’s nothing forcing the administration to issue them. They’re entirely discretionary. This is the President’s decision. The proposed rule flies in the face of his regulatory reform initiative to rein in unnecessary regulations that are costing jobs and interfering with our economy’s recovery.’

Feldman said the rules, which could result in most of the US being in violation of the Clean Air Act, may be unachievable even in a place like Yellowstone National Park that has background levels of naturally occurring ozone that sometimes exceed the proposed new standards.

Air quality has steadily improved in America and will continue to do so under the existing ozone standards, Feldman added. He called on EPA to withdraw its proposal and reconsider adjustments to the standards in the normal review cycle in 2013. Though EPA may not directly consider costs when setting the level of the standards, the policy decision of whether to set these standards must be informed by the cost to society, especially at this time in our economic recovery, he said.

Read the article online at:


Embed article link: (copy the HTML code below):