Skip to main content

North Dakota aims to reduce flaring

Hydrocarbon Engineering,


According to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), approximately one third of the natural gas produced in North Dakota in recent years has been flared rather than sold to customers or consumed onsite.

The rapid growth in North Dakota oil production, which rose from more than 230 000 bpd in January 2010 to more than 1.13 million bpd in August 2014, has led to increased volumes of associated gas, or natural gas that comes from oil reservoirs. These increased volumes require additional infrastructure to gather, process, and transport gas volumes instead of flaring them. These additions can take time to build, and well operators are often reluctant to delay production. In an effort to reduce the amount of natural gas flared, North Dakota’s Industrial Commission (NDIC) established targets that decrease the amount of flared gas over the next seven years.

The first target of 26% flared is set for fourth quarter 2014, with continued decreases in flaring reaching 10% by 2020. North Dakota recently reported that it was close to achieving the 26% reduction target for natural gas flaring, as the percentage in August was 28% flared, or 375 million ft3/d out of a total production of 1340 million ft3/d. The rest of the produced natural gas was either sold or used at the production site.

Natural gas is flared, or burned directly to the atmosphere, rather than being vented without combustion because methane, the primary constituent of natural gas, has a much higher global warming potential than carbon dioxide, the main component of combusted gas. By law, North Dakota prohibits natural gas venting.

The NDIC seeks to reduce the volume of flared gas, even if it means cutting back production at its largest oil production areas (the Bakken and Three Forks formations). The NDIC’s order issued on 1 July said it will ‘consider amending…field rules to restrict oil production and/or impose such provisions as deemed appropriate to reduce the amount of flared gas’. Recognising the difficult economics of dealing with rapidly declining production from newly drilled wells, the NDIC’s order allows for exemptions on a case by case basis.

The North Dakota Pipeline Authority estimates that more than one third of the flared gas results from a lack of gathering pipelines. Infrastructure buildouts can cause delays in realising the value of crude oil and other liquids that motivate drilling in North Dakota, and are uneconomic when natural gas volumes there are too low. The largest challenge, according to the NDIC, is securing landowner permission for connection activities, which can delay projects half a year or longer. Other obstacles include zoning and permitting delays, harsh weather, and labour shortages. The remaining flared gas results from challenges to existing infrastructure, including the need for additional gathering line pressure to offset higher pressure from newly drilled wells, additional gathering pipeline capacity at high pressure wells, and additional clearing of existing lines to remove natural gas liquid volumes.

EIA reported that increased capacity to process and transport natural gas also contributes to higher volumes of natural gas that are sold rather than flared. By the end of the year, expected completions of natural gas processing plant projects would increase North Dakota’s natural gas processing capacity to 1454 million ft3/d, or 440 million ft3/d more than last year. ONEOK, Inc. plans to add another 400 million ft3/d of natural gas processing capacity by the end of 2016. Capacity to move this additional gas on pipelines would also increase as a result of the Northern Border Pipeline Company’s 55 mile Bakken Header pipeline (400 million ft3/d as early as 2016) and WBU Energy’s 375 mile Dakota Pipeline (between 400 and 500 million ft3/d by the end of 2017.


Adapted from a press release by Emma McAleavey.

Read the article online at: https://www.hydrocarbonengineering.com/gas-processing/20102014/reducing-north-dakota-flaring-1456/

You might also like

EMA and JERA sign LNG MoU

Under the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), EMA and JERA will share best practices and knowledge in LNG procurement and management of LNG supplies.

 
 

Embed article link: (copy the HTML code below):